curl --request POST \
--url https://api.agntdata.dev/v1/x/translate/detect \
--header 'Authorization: <api-key>' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data @- <<EOF
{
"text": "A panel on AI at the Paris Peace Forum today. Starting at 42'00, I plot the future of AI: all of our interactions with the digital world will be mediated by AI assistants that will eventually become smarter than us. Because they will become a common infrastructure containing all human culture and knowledge, they will need to be open/open source, just like the software infrastructure of the Internet is open/open source, and their training will need to be crowd-sourced, just like Wikipedia (see 46'00 in) This is one reason Meta made Llama-2 open/open source/free. In response to my tirade, Microsoft President Brad Smith had a very curious response (48'00). He said \"Meta is owned by shareholders. OpenAI is owned by a nonprofit . Which would you have more confidence in? Getting your technology from a non profit? or a for-profit company that is entirely controlled by one human being?\" This totally misrepresents what open access/open source means. I thought Microsoft had moved beyond its anti open source stance of the 1990s. Doesn't Azure run on Linux these days?"
}
EOF{
"lang": "eng",
"confidence": 1,
"script": "Latin",
"is_reliable": true
}This endpoint will return the Language of the Text
curl --request POST \
--url https://api.agntdata.dev/v1/x/translate/detect \
--header 'Authorization: <api-key>' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data @- <<EOF
{
"text": "A panel on AI at the Paris Peace Forum today. Starting at 42'00, I plot the future of AI: all of our interactions with the digital world will be mediated by AI assistants that will eventually become smarter than us. Because they will become a common infrastructure containing all human culture and knowledge, they will need to be open/open source, just like the software infrastructure of the Internet is open/open source, and their training will need to be crowd-sourced, just like Wikipedia (see 46'00 in) This is one reason Meta made Llama-2 open/open source/free. In response to my tirade, Microsoft President Brad Smith had a very curious response (48'00). He said \"Meta is owned by shareholders. OpenAI is owned by a nonprofit . Which would you have more confidence in? Getting your technology from a non profit? or a for-profit company that is entirely controlled by one human being?\" This totally misrepresents what open access/open source means. I thought Microsoft had moved beyond its anti open source stance of the 1990s. Doesn't Azure run on Linux these days?"
}
EOF{
"lang": "eng",
"confidence": 1,
"script": "Latin",
"is_reliable": true
}